QUOTE(xice @ Apr 9 2008, 01:50 AM)

DEEWANI JI,I WILL UPLOAD THIS SAME SONG OF "AITBAAR" RIPPED AT 128 KBPS,JUST LISTEN AND COMPARE WITH THIS 192 KBPS AND THEN TELL THE DIFFERENCE."CHAHAT HAI UNKI CHAHAT KO PANE KI
CHAHAT HAI CHAHAT KO AAJMANE KI
WO CHAHE HAMEIN CHAHE NA CHAHE
PAR CHAHAT HAI CHAHAT MEIN MIT JAANE KI"QUOTE(deewani @ Apr 9 2008, 09:59 AM)

QUOTE(xice @ Apr 8 2008, 01:13 AM)

I Can't Understand Why People Rip Songs Greater Than 128 kbps? It Does Not Increases The Sound Quality,only Size Of The Song Increases.
http://www.maximumpc.com/article/do_higher..._off?page=0%2C0 Is that supposed to prove something to ME? Lol, please don't. I OWN the original CD for this album. If you read the above or you did any research on the topic you will know that each person experiences things differently in this regard. People do not have the exact same ears for one, secondly men and women hear things differently, then there are the mulitple factors involved in the sound card, ripping method, encoder, headphones or speakers, software you are using to play it, ETC. And I've seen you upload things that are not from the source you stated, so I wouldn't trust your upload anyways, sorry. I trust my own ears with files I have listened to for over 20 years, thanks.
http://www.hamaraforums.com/index.php?show...mp;#entry453738http://www.hamaraforums.com/index.php?show...c=46752&hl=PS I also saw the posts you had edited and/or deleted in one of those topics months ago lecturing another member on "vinyls".

And there is a HUGE difference from ENCODING from the original source and TRANSCODING a web source. I can't understand why people do not accurately convey the source.
Huge apologies to Sitaji for posting offtopic in your thread. A belated welcome to HF. Ab tau hamare forum mein Sita bhi hai aur Lakshmi bhi.